All-of-Government Approach: How The Trump Administration Targeted The Transgender Community

Michael

3 min read

Post on Jul 23, 2025

5.0

Share

All-of-Government Approach: How the Trump Administration Targeted the Transgender Community

The Trump administration's four years in office witnessed a concerted effort to roll back protections for transgender individuals, employing what many critics described as an "all-of-government" approach. This strategy involved multiple agencies enacting policies that cumulatively impacted the transgender community, impacting healthcare access, employment opportunities, and overall well-being. This article delves into the key strategies and policies employed, analyzing their impact and the ongoing repercussions.

Targeting Healthcare Access:

One of the most significant attacks on transgender rights under the Trump administration focused on healthcare. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) played a central role. In 2018, HHS issued a rule allowing healthcare providers to refuse service based on religious objections, potentially impacting transgender individuals seeking gender-affirming care, such as hormone therapy or surgery. This action, widely condemned by LGBTQ+ advocacy groups like the ACLU and GLAAD, was seen as a direct undermining of the Affordable Care Act's (ACA) non-discrimination protections. The impact on access to crucial medical care for transgender individuals was immediate and significant.

Restricting Employment Opportunities:

The Trump administration also targeted transgender individuals in the workplace. The Department of Justice (DOJ) actively fought against legal protections for transgender employees. They argued against the inclusion of gender identity in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, a move that severely threatened the employment rights of transgender individuals. This stance culminated in the Supreme Court case Bostock v. Clayton County, where the court ultimately ruled in favor of transgender employees, finding that discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity is a form of sex discrimination prohibited by Title VII. However, the administration's efforts to weaken these protections significantly impacted the fight for equal employment opportunities.

Military Ban and Other Discriminatory Policies:

The administration's actions extended beyond healthcare and employment. A controversial ban on transgender individuals serving openly in the military was implemented, forcing many transgender service members to either leave their service or conceal their identity. This policy, fiercely challenged in court, caused significant distress and instability within the military community. Other agencies also enacted policies that indirectly, but significantly, impacted the transgender community, creating a pervasive atmosphere of discrimination.

The Legacy of an "All-of-Government" Approach:

The Trump administration's systematic targeting of the transgender community through an "all-of-government" approach had far-reaching consequences. The resulting legal battles and policy reversals have created uncertainty and instability for transgender individuals across the United States. The long-term impact on access to healthcare, employment opportunities, and overall well-being is still being assessed. Many argue that the administration's actions normalized discrimination and emboldened anti-LGBTQ+ sentiment.

Moving Forward:

The Biden administration has reversed several of these discriminatory policies, signaling a shift towards greater inclusivity. However, the legacy of the Trump era's attacks remains, highlighting the need for continued advocacy and legal protection for transgender rights. Organizations like the National Center for Transgender Equality (NCTE) continue to fight for equal rights and protections for the transgender community.

Keywords: Transgender rights, Trump administration, all-of-government approach, healthcare access, employment discrimination, military ban, LGBTQ+ rights, gender-affirming care, Title VII, Bostock v. Clayton County, ACLU, GLAAD, NCTE.