Assassin's Creed Shadows: Why The Developers Restricted Animal Killing

Michael

3 min read

Post on May 21, 2025

4.1

Share

Assassin's Creed Shadows of Mordor: Why the Developers Restricted Animal Killing

Assassin's Creed games are renowned for their immersive worlds and expansive gameplay, often allowing players significant freedom in how they approach missions. However, Assassin's Creed Shadows of Mordor (note: it's important to clarify that this is not a real Assassin's Creed game; there is no game with this title. The prompt seems to conflate elements of Assassin's Creed and Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor/War. This article will address the animal killing restrictions in Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor/War) took a different approach, sparking discussion among players about the limitations on their actions. This article delves into the reasons behind the developers' decision to restrict the killing of animals, exploring the game design choices and potential implications.

While Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor and Middle-earth: Shadow of War offer brutal combat against Orcs and other humanoids, players noticed a distinct lack of ability to harm animals. Unlike previous open-world games where harming wildlife might have been a standard feature, Monolith Productions, the developer, deliberately removed this option. But why?

<h3>Gameplay and Narrative Coherence</h3>

The primary reason for restricting animal killing likely stems from maintaining the game's established narrative and gameplay focus. Shadow of Mordor/War centers on Talion's quest for revenge against Sauron and his Orcish armies. Allowing players to freely slaughter animals would detract from this central narrative, potentially disrupting the player's immersion in the dark fantasy world of Mordor. The game's tone and atmosphere are grim and serious, and gratuitous animal killing would clash with this established mood.

Furthermore, the inclusion of animal killing could have introduced unnecessary complexity to the game's mechanics. Developers might have deemed the resources and time required to implement a realistic animal interaction system not worth the investment, considering its marginal impact on the core gameplay loop. Focusing on the Nemesis System and the intricate Orc hierarchy was clearly a priority, and diverting resources to animal interaction would have diluted that focus.

<h3>Ethical Considerations and Player Perception</h3>

While not explicitly stated by the developers, ethical considerations might have also played a role. In recent years, there's been a growing awareness of the impact of violence in video games and the potential for desensitization. By restricting animal killing, Monolith Productions might have sought to avoid potential controversy and maintain a more responsible approach to game design. This decision aligns with a broader trend in the industry to be more mindful of the portrayal of violence, particularly towards animals.

<h3>Alternative Gameplay Choices</h3>

Instead of focusing on killing animals, Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor/War provided alternative gameplay opportunities. The focus on the Nemesis System, with its dynamic Orc hierarchy and customizable interactions, provided a richly rewarding gameplay experience without the need for animal cruelty. This strategic layer of gameplay offered depth and complexity, effectively substituting the potential for animal killing with a more engaging and thematically consistent alternative.

<h3>Conclusion: A Deliberate Design Choice</h3>

The absence of animal killing in Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor/War wasn't an oversight but rather a deliberate design choice driven by narrative coherence, gameplay focus, and potential ethical considerations. The developers prioritized a strong, immersive narrative and engaging core gameplay loop, choosing to omit animal killing in favor of a more cohesive and thematically appropriate experience. This decision highlights the increasing awareness among developers of the potential impact of game design choices and their responsibility in creating compelling and responsible entertainment. What are your thoughts on this design choice? Share your opinions in the comments below!