Ben Roberts-Smith Loses War Crimes Defamation Case Appeal

Michael

3 min read

Post on May 17, 2025

5.0

Share

Ben Roberts-Smith Loses War Crimes Defamation Case Appeal: High Court Upholds Verdict

Former Australian soldier Ben Roberts-Smith has suffered a significant setback in his defamation battle, losing his appeal against a landmark verdict that found he committed war crimes in Afghanistan. The High Court of Australia dismissed his appeal on Thursday, effectively upholding the lower court's judgment that labelled him a liar and a war criminal. This decision marks a final chapter in a long and highly publicized legal battle that has gripped the nation.

The initial defamation case, brought against three major Australian newspapers – The Age, The Sydney Morning Herald, and The Canberra Times – centred around allegations of unlawful killings and other misconduct during Roberts-Smith's deployments to Afghanistan with the Australian Special Air Service Regiment (SAS). The Federal Court previously ruled in favour of the newspapers, finding that their reporting of these allegations was substantially true.

Roberts-Smith's Appeal Fails to Persuade the High Court

Roberts-Smith’s appeal focused on several key points, including challenges to the judge's handling of evidence and the overall fairness of the trial. However, the High Court judges found no grounds to overturn the original verdict. The judgment delivered a resounding defeat for Roberts-Smith, confirming the serious allegations against him and solidifying the newspapers' reporting as accurate. This outcome carries significant implications for both the legal landscape and the ongoing investigation into alleged war crimes by Australian soldiers.

Key Takeaways from the High Court Ruling:

• Confirmation of War Crimes Allegations: The High Court's decision reinforces the findings of the Federal Court, significantly impacting the public perception of Roberts-Smith and the broader narrative surrounding alleged war crimes committed by Australian troops in Afghanistan.
• Impact on Public Accountability: The ruling underscores the importance of holding individuals accountable for alleged war crimes, even those of high profile military figures. It demonstrates the power of investigative journalism in uncovering and exposing such serious allegations.
• Implications for Future Defamation Cases: This case sets a significant precedent for future defamation cases involving public figures and allegations of serious misconduct. It highlights the high burden of proof required to successfully defend against allegations of this nature.

The Broader Context: The Brereton Inquiry and Ongoing Investigations

The Roberts-Smith case is closely linked to the findings of the Brereton Inquiry, which investigated alleged war crimes by Australian soldiers in Afghanistan. The inquiry's damning report, released in 2020, detailed numerous instances of unlawful killings and other serious misconduct. While Roberts-Smith's case is concluded, the ramifications of the Brereton Inquiry continue to unfold, with ongoing investigations and potential legal proceedings against other individuals.

What Happens Next?

While the legal battle for Roberts-Smith is over, the broader implications of this case will continue to be debated and analyzed. The focus now shifts to the ongoing investigations into alleged war crimes and the broader conversation surrounding accountability within the Australian Defence Force. The High Court's ruling serves as a stark reminder of the importance of truth and accountability in matters of national security and international law. This landmark decision will undoubtedly shape future legal discussions and inquiries into similar allegations.

Further Reading:

This case highlights the critical role of investigative journalism and the importance of holding powerful individuals accountable for their actions. The implications extend far beyond Roberts-Smith himself, shaping the future of accountability within the Australian military and influencing the broader public discourse on war crimes.