Can Biden Match Trump's EU Trade Aggressiveness Against China?

Michael

3 min read

Post on Aug 01, 2025

4.3

Share

Can Biden Match Trump's EU Trade Aggressiveness Against China? A Transatlantic Tightrope Walk

The simmering trade war between the US and China took on a new dimension under the Trump administration, marked by aggressive tariffs and a confrontational stance. Now, with President Biden at the helm, the question remains: can he maintain, or even escalate, the same level of trade pressure against China, and more importantly, can he do so in concert with the European Union? The answer is complex and hinges on navigating a delicate transatlantic relationship while addressing shared concerns about Chinese trade practices.

Trump's Legacy: A Tariff-Heavy Approach

The Trump era saw a significant escalation of trade tensions with China, characterized by sweeping tariffs on billions of dollars worth of goods. This aggressive approach, while aiming to protect American industries and intellectual property, also disrupted global supply chains and sparked retaliatory measures from Beijing. This period highlighted the complexities of decoupling from the Chinese economy, a strategy championed by some but criticized by others for its potential economic consequences. [Link to article about Trump's China trade policy]

Biden's Nuances: A Multi-Pronged Strategy

Biden's approach to China differs significantly in tone but shares some strategic overlaps. While he hasn't embraced the same level of tariff-driven aggression, his administration has focused on a multi-pronged strategy:

• Targeting specific sectors: Instead of broad tariffs, the Biden administration has concentrated on addressing specific concerns, such as China's subsidies for certain industries and intellectual property theft. This targeted approach aims for greater precision and potentially less disruptive economic fallout.
• Strengthening alliances: A key difference lies in Biden's emphasis on multilateralism and strengthening alliances, particularly with the EU. This collaborative approach contrasts sharply with Trump's "America First" stance.
• Investing in domestic industries: Similar to Trump's focus, Biden’s administration is heavily invested in bolstering domestic manufacturing and technological capabilities to reduce reliance on China. This includes significant investment in infrastructure and clean energy technologies.

EU Alignment: A Necessary but Challenging Partnership

The EU's stance on China is complex. While sharing concerns about unfair trade practices and human rights abuses, the EU also maintains significant economic ties with China, making a completely aligned approach challenging. Furthermore, the EU has historically favored a more multilateral approach to trade disputes, often preferring negotiations and WTO mechanisms over unilateral actions.

The Path Forward: Cooperation or Competition?

For the US and the EU to effectively counter China's trade practices, a united front is crucial. However, achieving this requires addressing differing approaches and priorities. Areas of potential cooperation include:

• Strengthening WTO rules: Both the US and EU could work together to reform the WTO and make it more effective in addressing unfair trade practices.
• Joint investment in critical technologies: Collaboration on research and development in areas like 5G and semiconductors could reduce reliance on China.
• Harmonizing regulations: Aligning standards and regulations could create a more level playing field for businesses and reduce the advantage enjoyed by Chinese firms.

Conclusion: A Balancing Act

While Biden might not mirror Trump's aggressive tariff strategy, his administration's approach to China is certainly assertive. The success of this strategy hinges on effective collaboration with the EU. Navigating this complex relationship will require a delicate balancing act, prioritizing shared goals while acknowledging differing national interests. The coming years will be crucial in determining whether a transatlantic alliance can effectively challenge China's growing economic influence. The question remains open, but the necessity for cooperation is undeniable.