Did Della Maddalena's Dominance Cost Us The Dream Matchup?

Michael

3 min read

Post on May 13, 2025

4.6

Share

Did Della Maddalena's Dominance Cost Us the Dream Matchup? A Look at UFC 293's Unexpected Fallout

The UFC 293 main event saw a shockingly swift victory for Israel Adesanya over Sean Strickland, a win that, while impressive, left many fans feeling a little…underwhelmed. The reason? The absence of a potential dream matchup against the surging Dricus du Plessis. So, did the utter dominance of Robert Whittaker over the previously undefeated Bo Nickal – a fight that overshadowed the co-main event – and Della Maddalena’s impressive win ultimately cost us the clash everyone wanted to see?

The narrative leading up to UFC 293 heavily featured the possibility of a title fight between Adesanya and du Plessis. The South African contender had built significant momentum, presenting himself as a legitimate threat to the champion's reign. A compelling storyline emerged, promising fireworks and a potentially career-defining fight for both fighters. But the path to that dream matchup was paved with hurdles, and one of those, arguably, was the unexpected outcomes of the supporting cards.

The Whittaker-Nickal Impact and the Ripple Effect

Robert Whittaker's masterful performance against Bo Nickal completely shifted the landscape. Nickal, the highly touted wrestling prodigy, was expected to challenge for a title shot with a convincing win. His defeat, however swift and decisive Whittaker's victory was, removed a potential obstacle to Adesanya-Du Plessis. Instead of a potential Nickal title shot, Adesanya’s options seemed narrowed to either a rematch with Strickland or du Plessis.

The narrative surrounding this was complex. Had Nickal won, the UFC might have felt obligated to grant him a title shot, potentially delaying or even preventing the Adesanya-Du Plessis fight altogether. Whittaker's victory, while celebrated by many, inadvertently cleared the path for Adesanya to choose his next opponent. And he chose the less exciting option, at least from a narrative standpoint.

Della Maddalena's Rise and the Shifting Sands

While not as directly impactful as the Whittaker-Nickal fight, the continued rise of aussie welterweight talent, Jack Della Maddalena, also contributed to a shift in the overall UFC narrative. Della Maddalena's impressive win further solidified the UFC's focus on developing homegrown talent. This focus, while strategically sound for the promotion, might have subtly influenced the decision-making process regarding the title picture.

With the promotion showcasing promising talents like Della Maddalena and Whittaker, the pressure to deliver the "dream" matchup, while still significant, might have been slightly lessened. The UFC might have viewed the opportunities for fresh storylines and future potential as equally, if not more, important.

The Ultimate Question: Was it Worth It?

Ultimately, whether the dominance of Whittaker and Della Maddalena "cost" us the Adesanya-Du Plessis fight is subjective. While the absence of the highly anticipated matchup is undeniably disappointing for many fans, the UFC delivered exciting performances and showcased rising stars. The long-term strategic benefits for the promotion might outweigh the immediate disappointment of missing out on a potentially explosive main event.

The UFC's decision-making process is multifaceted, balancing fan expectations with its own long-term plans. While the Adesanya-Strickland fight was technically impressive, the lack of the anticipated clash leaves many wondering what could have been. The future will tell if the UFC's calculated risks paid off, particularly in terms of generating buzz and engagement for future events. What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below!