Hegseth's Decision: The Removal Of Harvey Milk's Name From Navy Vessel

Michael

3 min read

Post on Jun 05, 2025

4.7

Share

Hegseth's Decision: The Controversy Surrounding the Removal of Harvey Milk's Name from a Navy Vessel

The recent decision by Navy Secretary Carlos Del Toro to remove the name of Harvey Milk, a pioneering gay rights activist, from a future Navy vessel has ignited a firestorm of controversy. This reversal, driven by concerns raised by Republican Congressman Pete Hegseth, raises significant questions about the Navy's naming process and the ongoing debate surrounding LGBTQ+ representation in the military. The decision has sparked outrage amongst LGBTQ+ advocates and allies, while supporters of the reversal cite concerns about political polarization and the suitability of naming military vessels after politically divisive figures.

The Backstory: A Symbol of Progress, Now a Source of Division

The USS Harvey Milk (USNS-700), originally slated to be a fleet replenishment oiler, was intended to be a powerful symbol of progress, honoring Milk's legacy as the first openly gay elected official in California. His story, one of courage and advocacy in the face of adversity, resonated deeply with many. The naming represented a significant step towards inclusivity within the military, a branch of government historically associated with conservative values.

However, criticism of the choice began almost immediately, with some arguing that naming a military ship after a politically controversial figure would be divisive. This argument gained traction, particularly within conservative circles. The involvement of Congressman Pete Hegseth, a vocal critic of what he perceives as excessive political correctness, significantly escalated the conflict.

Hegseth's Influence and the Reversal:

Hegseth, a prominent voice within the Republican Party and a veteran himself, argued that Milk's political views and activism were inappropriate for a vessel representing the US Navy. He questioned the selection process and raised concerns about the potential negative impact on morale within the ranks. While the specifics of his influence on Secretary Del Toro's decision remain unclear, his vocal opposition played a significant role in the ultimate reversal.

The Fallout and Ongoing Debate:

The decision to remove Milk's name has drawn sharp condemnation from LGBTQ+ organizations and Democratic lawmakers. They view it as a setback for inclusivity within the military and a disservice to Milk's legacy. Many see this as a political move, fueled by partisan divisions and a disregard for the progress made in LGBTQ+ acceptance.

This controversy highlights a larger, ongoing debate: How should the military balance its role as a non-partisan institution with the need to reflect the diversity of the nation it serves? Should the naming of military vessels solely reflect military achievements or also incorporate broader societal values and progress?

Looking Ahead: What Does This Mean for Future Navy Vessel Naming?

The reversal of the USS Harvey Milk's name raises crucial questions about transparency and the criteria used in selecting names for naval vessels. The process, critics argue, needs to be more inclusive and transparent. This incident could lead to calls for greater public input and more robust vetting procedures to prevent similar controversies in the future. The debate is far from over, and the repercussions of this decision are likely to be felt for years to come.

Keywords: Harvey Milk, USS Harvey Milk, Navy Secretary Carlos Del Toro, Pete Hegseth, LGBTQ+, military, Navy vessel naming, political controversy, inclusivity, diversity, LGBTQ+ representation in the military, fleet replenishment oiler.